Right to Health
MÁS DERECHOS Y MENOS PREJUICIOS: Guía de buenas prácticas en comunicación para el desarrollo y salud mental, en el contexto de la migración venezolana
Ante la crisis migratoria venezolana en Perú y la pandemia por la COVID-19, en Tumbes, Piura, La Libertad, Lima y Callao, el Proyecto Alma Llanera se planteó al objetivo general de mejorar la autosuficiencia y la integración de personas refugiadas y migrantes venezolanas vulnerables en Perú, a través de un mayor acceso a los servicios de protección, salud mental y a los medios de vida.
Esta guía se centra en los servicios de salud mental. Particularmente, identifica las mejores prácticas de comunicación para el desarrollo en la promoción de la salud mental. Las mismas que responden a estas dos preguntas clave: (1) ¿Cómo derribamos el estigma asociado a la salud mental entre las personas migrantes para convertirlos en agentes de cambio?, y (2) ¿Cómo evitamos las generalizaciones y transformamos la eventual xenofobia en empatía y confianza? La guía cuenta con cinco capítulos. El primero narra los antecedentes de la intervención. El segundo la describe. Para ello, presenta sus conceptos clave, los territorios en los que operó y los criterios y las dimensiones sobre las que se calificaron las buenas prácticas. El tercer capítulo presenta las cuatro buenas prácticas seleccionadas. Al final de la guía encontrará tanto las conclusiones como las recomendaciones para promover la salud mental, a través de iniciativas de comunicación para el desarrollo.
Las cuatro buenas prácticas destacadas en esta publicación se centran en las personas y adoptan una comprensión integral de la salud mental que, para empoderar tanto a las comunidades venezolanas como de acogida, responde a los determinantes sociales, incluye la continuidad y calidad de cuidados integrales y requiere del trabajo interdisciplinario e intercultural. A través del arte, la música, la cocina y las historias personales, las buenas prácticas de esta guía generaron un espacio (físico o virtual) de divertimento, encuentro e intercambio.
Con el objetivo de promover la salud mental en el país, desde una perspectiva humana y de derechos, la guía tiene como uno de sus propósitos contribuir a que distintas iniciativas también sean culturalmente apropiadas y efectivas promoviendo el bienestar de las poblaciones migrantes y de acogida. Read More...
Esta guía se centra en los servicios de salud mental. Particularmente, identifica las mejores prácticas de comunicación para el desarrollo en la promoción de la salud mental. Las mismas que responden a estas dos preguntas clave: (1) ¿Cómo derribamos el estigma asociado a la salud mental entre las personas migrantes para convertirlos en agentes de cambio?, y (2) ¿Cómo evitamos las generalizaciones y transformamos la eventual xenofobia en empatía y confianza? La guía cuenta con cinco capítulos. El primero narra los antecedentes de la intervención. El segundo la describe. Para ello, presenta sus conceptos clave, los territorios en los que operó y los criterios y las dimensiones sobre las que se calificaron las buenas prácticas. El tercer capítulo presenta las cuatro buenas prácticas seleccionadas. Al final de la guía encontrará tanto las conclusiones como las recomendaciones para promover la salud mental, a través de iniciativas de comunicación para el desarrollo.
Las cuatro buenas prácticas destacadas en esta publicación se centran en las personas y adoptan una comprensión integral de la salud mental que, para empoderar tanto a las comunidades venezolanas como de acogida, responde a los determinantes sociales, incluye la continuidad y calidad de cuidados integrales y requiere del trabajo interdisciplinario e intercultural. A través del arte, la música, la cocina y las historias personales, las buenas prácticas de esta guía generaron un espacio (físico o virtual) de divertimento, encuentro e intercambio.
Con el objetivo de promover la salud mental en el país, desde una perspectiva humana y de derechos, la guía tiene como uno de sus propósitos contribuir a que distintas iniciativas también sean culturalmente apropiadas y efectivas promoviendo el bienestar de las poblaciones migrantes y de acogida. Read More...
SISTEMATIZACIÓN DE LA ESTRATEGIA DE SALUD DEL PROYECTO ALMA LLANERA DE CARE PERÚ
El presente documento sistematiza la estrategia de salud del proyecto “Alma Llanera” de CARE Perú que se viene implementando en las regiones de Tumbes, Piura, La Libertad, Lima y Callao desde septiembre del 2019 hasta agosto de 2023. Dicha estrategia busca promover el acceso a servicios de salud de personas migrantes y refugiadas en sus ámbitos de intervención. Esta sistematización, enmarcada en un enfoque comunitario y participativo, consideró las miradas de las diferentes personas involucradas en la estrategia de salud del proyecto: equipo central y regional, consultores, agentes comunitarios de salud y beneficiarios del proyecto. Para ello, se recolectó la información a través de grupos de discusión, entrevistas individuales y encuestas, a la par de la revisión de documentos concernientes al programa y a la estrategia en particular; a fin de recoger buenas prácticas, lecciones aprendidas y procesos innovadores, que permitan generar aprendizajes internos e interinstitucionales. Los temas de salud y bienestar están atravesados por variables estructurales de pobreza, violencia, discriminación y corrupción aunados al limitado acceso de la población a los servicios de salud, en especial la refugiada y migrante. La pandemia por COVID-19, agudizó estás problemáticas y evidenció la importancia y necesidad de atender adecuadamente la salud física y mental. Para el proyecto “Alma Llanera” este contexto género una reorganización de su diseño y presupuesto para la priorización de la salud en la población migrante, a través de las ferias integrales, la entrega de vales de salud y la derivación a establecimientos de salud, considerando la vulnerabilidad de la población de refugiados y migrantes.
Entre las lecciones aprendidas resalta el que la estrategia de salud ha permitido acercar a la población refugiada y migrante a los servicios de salud, siendo esta una necesidad básica, sobre todo en situaciones de emergencia como ha sido la pandemia por la COVID-19. En este sentido, los vales permitieron atender situaciones de emergencia, pero evidenciaron las dificultades para la sostenibilidad del tratamiento producto de otras necesidades (alimentación, vivienda) que, en consecuencia, requieren igual atención inmediata. Read More...
Entre las lecciones aprendidas resalta el que la estrategia de salud ha permitido acercar a la población refugiada y migrante a los servicios de salud, siendo esta una necesidad básica, sobre todo en situaciones de emergencia como ha sido la pandemia por la COVID-19. En este sentido, los vales permitieron atender situaciones de emergencia, pero evidenciaron las dificultades para la sostenibilidad del tratamiento producto de otras necesidades (alimentación, vivienda) que, en consecuencia, requieren igual atención inmediata. Read More...
SISTEMATIZACIÓN DE LA ESTRATEGIA DE SALUD MENTAL DEL PROYECTO ALMA LLANERA DE CARE PERÚ
El presente documento sistematiza la estrategia de salud mental, la cual forma parte del segundo objetivo específico del proyecto “Alma Llanera” de CARE Perú que se viene implementando en las regiones de Tumbes, Piura, La Libertad, Lima y Callao desde septiembre del 2019 hasta agosto de 2023. Las acciones planteadas desde esta estrategia, enmarcadas en un enfoque territorial, apuntan a promover el acceso a servicios de salud mental de personas migrantes y refugiadas en sus ámbitos de intervención de manera integral considerando las variables sociales, políticas, culturales, económicas, entre otras. Todo ello, en el marco de lo establecido por la Ley 30947, Ley de Salud Mental1 (2019) y su Reglamento (Decreto Supremo 007-2020-SA)2 y acorde a los instrumentos internacionales de protección de derechos humanos, en el que el Estado peruano impulsa un proceso de reforma de la atención de salud mental con el fin de implementar un modelo de atención comunitario.
Esta sistematización, orientada desde una mirada comunitaria y participativa, incorpora las voces y saberes de las diferentes personas involucradas en la estrategia: equipo central y regional del proyecto, consultores del proyecto, responsables de la estrategia de salud mental de las DIRIS/DIRESAS/GERESAS, jefe/as y/o responsable de participación social comunitaria de los CSMC, agentes comunitarios de salud y beneficiarios/as del proyecto; a fin de recoger buenas prácticas, lecciones aprendidas y procesos innovadores, que permitan generar aprendizajes internos e interinstitucionales a partir de la implementación de esta estrategia. Las entrevistas individuales y los grupos de discusión fueron las técnicas principales para recolectar la información, complementado con la revisión de documentos concernientes al programa y a la estrategia en particular. Read More...
Esta sistematización, orientada desde una mirada comunitaria y participativa, incorpora las voces y saberes de las diferentes personas involucradas en la estrategia: equipo central y regional del proyecto, consultores del proyecto, responsables de la estrategia de salud mental de las DIRIS/DIRESAS/GERESAS, jefe/as y/o responsable de participación social comunitaria de los CSMC, agentes comunitarios de salud y beneficiarios/as del proyecto; a fin de recoger buenas prácticas, lecciones aprendidas y procesos innovadores, que permitan generar aprendizajes internos e interinstitucionales a partir de la implementación de esta estrategia. Las entrevistas individuales y los grupos de discusión fueron las técnicas principales para recolectar la información, complementado con la revisión de documentos concernientes al programa y a la estrategia en particular. Read More...
Rapid Gender Analysis TO SUPPORT THE GOVERNMENT OF SIERRA LEONE TO STRENGTHEN ITS HEALTH SYSTEM
This Rapid Gender Analysis (RGA) report presents findings from the gender and power analysis carried out in November and December 2023 in Falaba, Kambia, Bonthe, Tonkolili, Kenema, Karene, Kailahun, and Pujehun districts of Sierra Leone. The purpose of the RGA is to understand how gender and social norms, roles, relationships, and dynamics influence health outcomes and health-seeking behavior in Sierra Leone, especially for vulnerable populations. The report will inform the development of CARE’s future health programming and proposed interventions for health funding opportunities.
The document is structured into four primary chapters – Background, Methodology, Findings: Results and Analysis, and Recommendations—each containing sub-chapters. The background section outlines the study’s purpose, objectives, and underlying rationale. The methodology section describes the research design, applied approaches, data collection methods and participant information. The study’s key findings are categorized into distinct thematic areas aligned with CARE's Good Practices Framework for Gender Analysis and includes the following Core Areas of Inquiry:
• Household decision-making, division of labor and control of productive assets
• Control over one’s body
• Access to public spaces and services
• Claiming rights and meaningful participation in public decision-making
The RGA also applies the above domains related to health outcomes, behaviors, and health-seeking behavior, including gender dynamics within the Sierra Leone health system with recognition that unequal gender dynamics gaps impact health care providers and their ability to deliver quality services. Finally, the recommendations section outlines actions or interventions CARE should consider in future programming.
Key Findings:
* Men have more influence over decisions for the household than women—including the seeking of healthcare—and women lack control over key decisions related to sex, marriage, and children, including if and when to use contraception. Women’s mobility is limited by social norms which require male permission for movement.
• Contraceptive use is low. Despite around 70% of people knowing about contraceptives and where to get them, only 50% are currently using them. Many community members believe modern forms of family planning are haram or unhealthy, with anecdotal evidence suggesting there is perception that it promotes extramarital affairs.
• Front Line Health Workers (FLHW) face major barriers to effective service delivery: almost half of FLHWs interviewed are unpaid, effectively operating as volunteers, struggle with difficult living conditions and lack of supplies, and report inequitable treatment between male and female workers.
• There is a lack of evidence-based health information for pregnant women: only 27% of pregnant women in the study reported having received any information related to sexual and reproductive health or associated risks.
• Despite generally positive health-seeking behavior, both women and men are concerned by lack of availability of medicine. Read More...
The document is structured into four primary chapters – Background, Methodology, Findings: Results and Analysis, and Recommendations—each containing sub-chapters. The background section outlines the study’s purpose, objectives, and underlying rationale. The methodology section describes the research design, applied approaches, data collection methods and participant information. The study’s key findings are categorized into distinct thematic areas aligned with CARE's Good Practices Framework for Gender Analysis and includes the following Core Areas of Inquiry:
• Household decision-making, division of labor and control of productive assets
• Control over one’s body
• Access to public spaces and services
• Claiming rights and meaningful participation in public decision-making
The RGA also applies the above domains related to health outcomes, behaviors, and health-seeking behavior, including gender dynamics within the Sierra Leone health system with recognition that unequal gender dynamics gaps impact health care providers and their ability to deliver quality services. Finally, the recommendations section outlines actions or interventions CARE should consider in future programming.
Key Findings:
* Men have more influence over decisions for the household than women—including the seeking of healthcare—and women lack control over key decisions related to sex, marriage, and children, including if and when to use contraception. Women’s mobility is limited by social norms which require male permission for movement.
• Contraceptive use is low. Despite around 70% of people knowing about contraceptives and where to get them, only 50% are currently using them. Many community members believe modern forms of family planning are haram or unhealthy, with anecdotal evidence suggesting there is perception that it promotes extramarital affairs.
• Front Line Health Workers (FLHW) face major barriers to effective service delivery: almost half of FLHWs interviewed are unpaid, effectively operating as volunteers, struggle with difficult living conditions and lack of supplies, and report inequitable treatment between male and female workers.
• There is a lack of evidence-based health information for pregnant women: only 27% of pregnant women in the study reported having received any information related to sexual and reproductive health or associated risks.
• Despite generally positive health-seeking behavior, both women and men are concerned by lack of availability of medicine. Read More...
End Phase Evaluation: Epidemic Control and Reinforcement of Health Services (ECRHS) Phase II Project in Sierra Leone
The Epidemic Control and Reinforcement of Health System Services (ECRHS) project is funded under the German Financial Cooperation (BMZ) with Sierra Leone through KfW. Two phases have been successfully completed during the project implementation. The first phase of the project was launched in November 2015 and ended in 2018. The first phase was originally designed to respond to the Ebola outbreak. The second phase of the ECRHS project was considered an extended phase of the ECRHS I; and started in January 2019. Whereas the primary focus of ECRHSI was on public health emergency response, the aim of phase II of ECRHS is the sustainable establishment of an epidemiological control system, whilst also strengthening the performance of the health system with a focus on reproductive health / self-determined family planning. The purpose of this report therefore is to present findings of the final evaluation of the ECRHS II programme evaluation which was carried out with the general objective of ‘assessing the result and impact of the project goal and outcomes in targeted northern region of Sierra Leone’. Read More...
REPORT END PHASE EVALUATION (Epidemic Control and Reinforcement of Health Services (ECRHS) Phase 1 Programme in Sierra Leone) Ebola Emergency Response April
This report presents findings from the end phase evaluation of the Epidemic Control and Reinforcement of Health Services (ECRHS) Phase 1 Programme in Sierra Leone, which was implemented from November 2015 to December 2018. The aim of the Programme is to ‘Improve the health status of the population of Sierra Leone’. The Programme was originally designed to provide response to the Ebola outbreak in Sierra Leone, but also considered a longer-term view and worked towards putting in place preparations putting in place preparations for the transition of an extended health system strengthening (HSS) effort. Read More...
The True Cost of COVID-19 Vaccination Campaigns in South Sudan
By November 2023, South Sudan had received 7,076,570 doses and administered 5,101,991 doses of COVID-19 vaccine through various vaccination strategies to curb the detrimental effects of COVID-19. The country has fully vaccinated 5,033,836 individuals across 80 counties of 10 states and 3 administrative areas .
CARE got funding from the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) through Crown Agents (prime recipient of UNICEF). CARE International South Sudan conducted both static and intensified National COVID-19 Vaccination Campaign (NCVC)/Integrated COVID-19 Vaccination and Preventive Therapy (ICVOPT) in 9 counties from 3 states and 2 administrative areas out of 80 counties in South Sudan. CARE implemented the NCVC in Jonglei State (Twic East, Bor South & Duk counties), Western Bahr El Ghazal State (Jur River and Wau counties), Unity State (Rubkona and Mayom counties), Greater Pibor Administrative Area (Pibor County and Boma sub-county), and Ruweng Administrative Area (Pariang county).
Read More...
CARE got funding from the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) through Crown Agents (prime recipient of UNICEF). CARE International South Sudan conducted both static and intensified National COVID-19 Vaccination Campaign (NCVC)/Integrated COVID-19 Vaccination and Preventive Therapy (ICVOPT) in 9 counties from 3 states and 2 administrative areas out of 80 counties in South Sudan. CARE implemented the NCVC in Jonglei State (Twic East, Bor South & Duk counties), Western Bahr El Ghazal State (Jur River and Wau counties), Unity State (Rubkona and Mayom counties), Greater Pibor Administrative Area (Pibor County and Boma sub-county), and Ruweng Administrative Area (Pariang county).
Read More...
ESTUDIO DE EVALUACIÓN EXTERNA DEL PROYECTO GROW: “DESARROLLANDO CAPACIDADES PARA OFRECER TRATAMIENTO POR EL ABUSO DE SUSTANCIAS SENSIBLE AL GÉNERO 2014 – 2021-INFORME DE RESULTADOS
El informe presenta los hallazgos del estudio de evaluación externa del Proyecto GROW: “Desarrollando capacidades para ofrecer tratamiento por el abuso de sustancias sensible al género 2014 – 2021”, que en adelante denominaremos Proyecto GROW. El informe contiene una síntesis de la información generada, procesada y analizada para responder a las preguntas que contiene cada uno de los siete objetivos específicos del estudio. Read More...
Gender and Power Analysis on CoVID-19 Health System Strengthening Project (CoHSiS)
From July 2022 to April 2025, the COVID-19, and Health System Strengthening Support Project (commonly known as CoHSiS) will be in operation. This three-year initiative, funded by the Japan Social Development Fund (JSDF) and administered by the World Bank Group, aims to empower municipalities to prepare for and respond to COVID-19 and other health emergencies. Specifically, CoHSiS’s implementation is focused on two municipalities: Covalima and Viqueque. To ensure gender equality, the project will incorporate CARE's Gender Equality and Women’s Voice Framework into all its intervention. As part of its planning process, the project aims to conduct a comprehensive gender analysis on six key areas of inquiry: (i) Sexual/gender division of labour, (ii) household decision-making, (iii) claiming rights and meaningful participation in public decision-making, (iv) access to public space and services, (v) control over productive assets, and (vi) violence and restorative justice using both primary methods which include utilising SAA methodology in focus group discussions, key interviews with key stakeholders as key informants and individual survey with the community and secondary data sources.
Key findings
Sexual/Gender Division of Labor
Timor-Leste is predominantly a patriarchal society with strong social and gender norms and gendered power imbalances that lead to gender inequality. At the household level, women and girls are overburdened with work as they perform most of the household chores and child and elder care; and spend their time on agriculture or horticulture work as well as contributing to community or cultural events. On the other hand, based on the primary data analysis, men are expected to be breadwinners for the family and women are expected to take care of the household. In cases where men have performed chores outside their prescribed roles, for example, the daily clock showed caring for babies, taking care of the children, and doing household activities like cooking and fetching water, women and the community at large have stigmatised men. When men try to take up roles that are already defined as women's roles, women and the community can even call men "gay". Additionally, women spend an average of 12 hours daily (5 am – 10 pm) on household chores while men spend an average of 9 hours daily on productive work (6 am – 10 pm) taking out resting time from both males and females. Self-confidence and belief in their own abilities are key components that aid women in negotiating for a fairer household division of labour with their partner.
Despite the existence of negotiation between partners for sharing household chores, tasks remain gendered and resistant to change. Men and boys who challenge these norms by performing household chores face backlash and stigmatization. However, there is some evidence of shifting trends, with more men participating in traditionally female chores.
Household Decision-Making
Generally, women have less decision-making power in households, with their scope often limited to daily matters like food consumption and management of finances for daily expenses. Men tend to make the more substantial decisions regarding matters like buying and selling large animals, land, and generally making agricultural choices.
The division of decision-making power varies depending on the marriage system, with some communities adhering to matrilineal traditions where women have more influence, but even in such cases, significant decisions still require consultation with males within the family.
The study highlights that attending traditional ceremonies and making decisions about children's futures, education, and financial matters can lead to conflicts if not handled jointly. While discussions with community members indicated the importance of mutual consultation in women's negotiation for decision-making, the study also found that women who make independent decisions without consulting their husbands are blamed if the outcomes are unfavourable.
Control over productive assets
In Timor-Leste, control over productive assets, including agricultural land, crops, and animals, poses a significant challenge for women. Men predominantly hold control over big productive assets, such as buffalos and horses, and are the primary decision-makers for household assets. There's a clear distinction between "big assets" and "small assets," with women primarily owning the latter, which includes items like Tais (traditional weavings) which have a lower monetary value.
However, there are signs of change, with recent developments, such as training and activities by NGOs and the government, leading to increased participation of women in decisions about household and productive assets. Joint decision-making, especially on assets with lower monetary value, is now more common. In some cases, men are giving women more autonomy over these assets.
Strategies employed by women to negotiate control over productive assets include mutual agreement, open communication, temporary changes in responsibilities, and shared responsibility.
The study also identifies differences in ownership and control of assets between patrilineal and matrilineal societies, where practices can vary significantly. For example, in patrilineal societies, the presence of a male family member often automatically bestows inheritance rights, while in matrilineal societies, women are prioritized for inheritance, particularly regarding land. However, the study notes that it is essential to consider the specific context of individual families. Read More...
Key findings
Sexual/Gender Division of Labor
Timor-Leste is predominantly a patriarchal society with strong social and gender norms and gendered power imbalances that lead to gender inequality. At the household level, women and girls are overburdened with work as they perform most of the household chores and child and elder care; and spend their time on agriculture or horticulture work as well as contributing to community or cultural events. On the other hand, based on the primary data analysis, men are expected to be breadwinners for the family and women are expected to take care of the household. In cases where men have performed chores outside their prescribed roles, for example, the daily clock showed caring for babies, taking care of the children, and doing household activities like cooking and fetching water, women and the community at large have stigmatised men. When men try to take up roles that are already defined as women's roles, women and the community can even call men "gay". Additionally, women spend an average of 12 hours daily (5 am – 10 pm) on household chores while men spend an average of 9 hours daily on productive work (6 am – 10 pm) taking out resting time from both males and females. Self-confidence and belief in their own abilities are key components that aid women in negotiating for a fairer household division of labour with their partner.
Despite the existence of negotiation between partners for sharing household chores, tasks remain gendered and resistant to change. Men and boys who challenge these norms by performing household chores face backlash and stigmatization. However, there is some evidence of shifting trends, with more men participating in traditionally female chores.
Household Decision-Making
Generally, women have less decision-making power in households, with their scope often limited to daily matters like food consumption and management of finances for daily expenses. Men tend to make the more substantial decisions regarding matters like buying and selling large animals, land, and generally making agricultural choices.
The division of decision-making power varies depending on the marriage system, with some communities adhering to matrilineal traditions where women have more influence, but even in such cases, significant decisions still require consultation with males within the family.
The study highlights that attending traditional ceremonies and making decisions about children's futures, education, and financial matters can lead to conflicts if not handled jointly. While discussions with community members indicated the importance of mutual consultation in women's negotiation for decision-making, the study also found that women who make independent decisions without consulting their husbands are blamed if the outcomes are unfavourable.
Control over productive assets
In Timor-Leste, control over productive assets, including agricultural land, crops, and animals, poses a significant challenge for women. Men predominantly hold control over big productive assets, such as buffalos and horses, and are the primary decision-makers for household assets. There's a clear distinction between "big assets" and "small assets," with women primarily owning the latter, which includes items like Tais (traditional weavings) which have a lower monetary value.
However, there are signs of change, with recent developments, such as training and activities by NGOs and the government, leading to increased participation of women in decisions about household and productive assets. Joint decision-making, especially on assets with lower monetary value, is now more common. In some cases, men are giving women more autonomy over these assets.
Strategies employed by women to negotiate control over productive assets include mutual agreement, open communication, temporary changes in responsibilities, and shared responsibility.
The study also identifies differences in ownership and control of assets between patrilineal and matrilineal societies, where practices can vary significantly. For example, in patrilineal societies, the presence of a male family member often automatically bestows inheritance rights, while in matrilineal societies, women are prioritized for inheritance, particularly regarding land. However, the study notes that it is essential to consider the specific context of individual families. Read More...